D'après des commentaires sur la video, le condo de 2,2 uF permettrait de ralentir le LFO, pas de l'accélérer.
Pour le range audio, il en faudrait un de 0,47 uF
Sur internet on trouve tout... Et son contraire
Autre question : faut-il utiliser des condensateurs électrolytiques ou céramiques ?
According to the description, C34 is now switchable between 1uF (original cap) and 2.2uF (new cap). That would give a choice between the original range and a lower(!) range. Not any audio range.
Was the 1uF cap in fact exchanged for something else? I'd expect it to be replaced by 0.1uF or smaller, to raise the range with a factor 10 or more.
(I'm not sure how high it goes in the original, though, but hundreds of Hz should be the goal.)
Or did I misunderstand things? :-)
et
I modified my MS10 as well. I recommend using two 1uF capacitors in parallel (2uF) for the low range and a .47uF capacitor for the high range. Now it goes from slower than stock up into the audio range for some great new sounds. Using these component values, there is a complete overlap with the stock LFO frequency range as well.
L'équipe d'Anafrog, soit on l'aime, soit on ne l'aime pas. Dans les deux cas elle s'en fout.
"It's not wise to upset a Wookiee."